Huang, David Junsong

Conceiving innovation diffusion as a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) broadens the approaches to foster scalable and sustainable diffusion of innovation in schools. This study adopted an Interpretivist Paradigm through multiple case studies to understand education leaders’ learning with regard to innovation diffusion as a CAS. There were four cases involving eight education leaders learning in four dyads. The purpose was to seek a descriptive and interpretative understanding of their learning processes, which included the knowledge development trajectories and the learning patterns through which the learning activities induced the knowledge development trajectories. Cognitive conflict was engaged as the learning strategy and learning activities included building an agent-based model, simulating the researcher’s model and playing a first-person role-play game. Analogical reasoning was engaged in reflections.

The grounded theory coding and analysis and episodic uptake analysis revealed nonlinearity of the knowledge development trajectories. The findings suggest that, prior to the learning, the dyads maintained ten simple Newtonian knowledge elements. After learning, the dyads made progression in developing ten comprehensive CAS knowledge elements. Analyzing the knowledge development trajectories indicated that the dyads experienced difficulties in constructing the CAS knowledge elements when they maintained prior Newtonian knowledge elements. The development trajectory of each knowledge element was gradual, progressing from conceptualization to comprehension and towards knowledge application in the real world. The development trajectories of the different knowledge elements were intertwined.

Further data analysis on how cognitive conflict enabled the learning processes implied nonlinear learning patterns. Cognitive conflict induced by analogical reasoning helped the dyads conceptualized the first CAS knowledge element, whereas cognitive conflict induced by model building and simulation did not. For the dyads who had conceptualized the first CAS knowledge element through analogical reasoning, the discrepancies generated from model building and simulation, from knowledge incompatibility and from game play induced cognitive conflicts and sustained the intertwined knowledge development trajectories.

There are sources of evidence in this study that could potentially extend the conventional conditions for analogical reasoning and cognitive conflict. The literature of analogical reasoning suggests that effective analogical reasoning requires learners’ adequate knowledge on the analogy and the target domain, and analogy’s sufficient degrees of similarities with the target. The learning patterns in this study seemed to suggest that, when the dyads, who lacked CAS knowledge, were conceptualizing the first CAS knowledge element, they did not learn through analogies that had more degrees of similarities; however, they learnt through analogies that had fewer degrees of similarities. Similarly, the findings may also suggest alternative views about the premises for cognitive conflict. The literature suggests that meaningful cognitive conflict requires discrepancies to be credible and relevant, and learners to have more prior knowledge. In this study, the agent-based models provided by the researcher were direct modeling of innovation diffusion, whereas the analogies used in reflections were from domains different from innovation diffusion and were only plausible to be mapped for the dyads to learn innovation diffusion. While the analogies induced valid discrepancy and meaningful cognitive conflict in this study, the model building and simulation did not. The findings in this study also alluded that salient knowledge that mediates learning Complex Systems is perhaps learner dependent and domain specific. The study thus advocates that research on analogical reasoning and cognitive conflict should focus on understanding learners’ meaning-making processes, rather than conditions for analogical reasoning and cognitive conflict.

Based on the findings, this study also espouses that learning Complex Systems perhaps involves meta-complexity: the learning of individual knowledge elements is complex, and the intertwined knowledge development trajectories also exhibit characteristics similar to scale-free network topologies. The implications of meta-complexity for learning design are also discussed to complement the design principles for learning Complex Systems.