Options
Research priorities for child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviours: An international perspective using a twin-panel Delphi procedure
Citation
Gillis, L., Tomkinson, G., Olds, T., Moreira, C., Christie, C., Nigg, C., Cerin, E., Van Sluijs, E., Stratton, G., Janssen, I., Dorovolomo, J., Reilly, J. J., Mota, J., Kashef Zayed, Kawalski, K., Andersen, L. B., Carrizosa, M., Tremblay, M., Chia, M., ... Van Mechelen, W. (2013). Research priorities for child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviours: An international perspective using a twin-panel Delphi procedure. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-112
Author
Gillis, Lauren
•
Tomkinson, Grant
•
Olds, Timothy
•
Moreira, Carla
•
Christie, Candice
•
Nigg, Claudio
•
Cerin, Ester
•
Van Sluijs, Esther
•
Stratton, Gareth
•
Janssen, Ian
•
Dorovolomo, Jeremy
•
Reilly, John J.
•
Mota, Jorge
•
Kashef Zayed
•
Kawalski, Kent
•
Andersen, Lars Bo
•
Carrizosa, Manuel
•
Tremblay, Mark
•
•
Hamlin, Mike
•
Thomas, Non Eleri
•
Maddison, Ralph
•
Biddle, Stuart
•
Gorely, Trish
•
Onywera, Vincent
•
Van Mechelen, Willem
Abstract
Background
The quantity and quality of studies in child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour have rapidly increased, but research directions are often pursued in a reactive and uncoordinated manner.
Aim To arrive at an international consensus on research priorities in the area of child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour.
Methods Two independent panels, each consisting of 12 experts, undertook three rounds of a Delphi methodology. The Delphi methodology required experts to anonymously answer questions put forward by the researchers with feedback provided between each round.
Results The primary outcome of the study was a ranked set of 29 research priorities that aimed to be applicable for the next 10 years. The top three ranked priorities were: developing effective and sustainable interventions to increase children’s physical activity long-term; policy and/or environmental change and their influence on children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour; and prospective, longitudinal studies of the independent effects of physical activity and sedentary behaviour on health.
Conclusions These research priorities can help to guide decisions on future research directions.
The quantity and quality of studies in child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour have rapidly increased, but research directions are often pursued in a reactive and uncoordinated manner.
Aim To arrive at an international consensus on research priorities in the area of child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour.
Methods Two independent panels, each consisting of 12 experts, undertook three rounds of a Delphi methodology. The Delphi methodology required experts to anonymously answer questions put forward by the researchers with feedback provided between each round.
Results The primary outcome of the study was a ranked set of 29 research priorities that aimed to be applicable for the next 10 years. The top three ranked priorities were: developing effective and sustainable interventions to increase children’s physical activity long-term; policy and/or environmental change and their influence on children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour; and prospective, longitudinal studies of the independent effects of physical activity and sedentary behaviour on health.
Conclusions These research priorities can help to guide decisions on future research directions.
Date Issued
2013
Publisher
Springer Nature
Journal
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
DOI
10.1186/1479-5868-10-112