Argumentative knowledge construction and certainty navigation: A comparison between individual and group work

URI
Thumbnail Image
Type
Conference paper
Files
Citation
Chen, W., Ng, E. E., Su, G., Su, J., Li, X., Chai, S. C. A., & Lyu, Q. (2023). Argumentative knowledge construction and certainty navigation: A comparison between individual and group work. In J.-L. Shih, A. Kashihara, W. Chen, & H. Ogata (Eds.), 31st International Conference on Computers in Education Conference Proceedings (Vol 1, pp. 301-306). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://eds.let.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ICCE2023/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ICCE2023-Proceedings-V1-1214-final.pdf
Author
Chen, Wenli 
•
Ng, Eng Eng
•
Su, Guo
•
Su, Junzhu
•
Li, Xinyi
•
Chai, Aileen Siew Cheng
•
Lyu, Qianru
Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which levels of certainty impacted the argumentative knowledge construction in individual work and group work. Argumentative knowledge construction has been characterized into simple claims, grounds, qualifiers, counterarguments, and integrated replies to illustrate the components of argumentation and nature of resolving conflicts in argumentation where certainty levels have been divided into uncertain, neutral, and certain. Findings showed that individual and group work differed significantly in terms of levels of certainty for simple arguments and counterarguments. Study implications were discussed

Keywords
Date Issued
2023
ISBN
9786269689019
Dataset
https://doi.org/10.25340/R4/IR2UUN