Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/14628
Title: 
Authors: 
Subjects: 
Short term memory
Intelligence measures
Quantitative methods
Statistical regression
Issue Date: 
2009
Citation: 
Lee, K., Lee, M. P., Ang, S. Y., & Stankov, L. (2009). Do measures of working memory predict academic proficiency better than measures of intelligence? Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 403-419. http://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/download/PschologyScience/4-2009/psq_4_2009_403-419.pdf
Abstract: 
It is often asserted that working memory predicts more variance in academic proficiency than do measures of intelligence. We used data from three studies to show that the validity of this assertion is highly dependent on the method of analysis. Using the same measures of intelligence, but different measures of working memory and algebraic proficiency, we found working memory provided better explanatory power only when analysis was conducted on the observed variable level. When the same data were analysed using structural equation models, only measures of intelligence had a direct effect on algebraic proficiency. From a theoretical viewpoint, our findings are consistent with a claim that working memory is a constituent component of (fluid) intelligence.
URI: 
ISSN: 
1866-6140
File Permission: 
Open
File Availability: 
With file
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PSQ-51-4-403.pdf206.67 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s) 10

239
checked on May 18, 2022

Download(s) 20

247
checked on May 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.