Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kerry-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Madeline Pe-
dc.contributor.authorAng, Su Yin-
dc.contributor.authorStankov, Lazar-
dc.identifier.citationLee, K., Lee, M. P., Ang, S. Y., & Stankov, L. (2009). Do measures of working memory predict academic proficiency better than measures of intelligence? Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 403-419.
dc.description.abstractIt is often asserted that working memory predicts more variance in academic proficiency than do measures of intelligence. We used data from three studies to show that the validity of this assertion is highly dependent on the method of analysis. Using the same measures of intelligence, but different measures of working memory and algebraic proficiency, we found working memory provided better explanatory power only when analysis was conducted on the observed variable level. When the same data were analysed using structural equation models, only measures of intelligence had a direct effect on algebraic proficiency. From a theoretical viewpoint, our findings are consistent with a claim that working memory is a constituent component of (fluid) intelligence.en
dc.rightsCopyright protected. Permission to publish required.-
dc.subjectShort term memoryen
dc.subjectIntelligence measuresen
dc.subjectQuantitative methodsen
dc.subjectStatistical regressionen
dc.titleDo measures of working memory predict academic proficiency better than measures of intelligence?en
item.fulltextWith file-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PSQ-51-4-403.pdf206.67 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 10

checked on Nov 24, 2022

Download(s) 20

checked on Nov 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.