Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/17676
Title: 
Authors: 
Keywords: 
Shoes
Singapore
Beijing
Visual analogue scale
Head-to-head
Issue Date: 
2015
Citation: 
Kong, V. P. W., Lim, C. Y., Ding, R., & Thorsten, S. (2015). Subjective evaluation of running footwear depends on country and assessment method: A bi-national study. Ergonomics, 58(9), 1589-1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1018957
Abstract: 
This study examined 1) the perception of running shoes between China (Beijing) and Singapore, and 2) whether running shoe preference depended on assessment methods. One hundred (n=50 each country) Chinese males subjectively evaluated four shoe models during running using two assessment procedures. Procedure 1 used a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess five perception variables. Procedure 2 was a ‘Head-to-head’ comparison of two shoes simultaneously (e.g. left foot: A, right foot: B) to decide which model was preferred. VAS scores were consistently higher in Beijing participants (P<.001), indicating a higher degree of liking. Singapore participants used the lower end but a wider range of the 15-cm scale for shoe discrimination. Moderate agreement was seen between the VAS and 'Head-to-head' procedures, with only 14 out of 100 participants matched all 6 pairwise comparisons (median=4 matches). Footwear companies and researchers should be aware that subjective shoe preference may vary with assessment methods.
Description: 
This is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in Ergonomics. The published version is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1018957
URI: 
ISSN: 
0014-0139 (print)
1366-5847 (online)
Other Identifiers: 
10.1080/00140139.2015.1018957
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ergonomics-58-9-1589.pdf430.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

49
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on May 24, 2019

Download(s) 20

158
checked on May 24, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.