Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/21708
Title: 
Authors: 
Supervisor: 
Lee, Yew Jin
Keywords: 
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Science learning outcomes
Singapore
New South Wales
Issue Date: 
2019
Citation: 
Ang, G. X. (2019). Comparing science learning outcomes from Singapore and New South Wales, Australia, using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Unpublished manuscript, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Abstract: 
Science learning outcomes from Singapore and New South Wales, Australia, were coded using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy from primary to pretertiary levels. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy allows the intellectual demands of learning outcomes to be classified into six cognitive processes and four types of knowledge. The employment of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy offered fresh insights into the intellectual demands of official science curricula from these two high-performing states. Analyses were done to understand how the intellectual demands vary across different subjects and educational levels, within each educational system. Comparisons were also made between the curriculum of the two states for each corresponding level and subject.
This study found that learning objectives in the Singapore curriculum were clustered at the three lowest
cognitive processes, whereas conceptual knowledge predominates in the knowledge domain. The New South
Wales science curriculum covers a wider range of cognitive processes as compared to Singapore’s, with
‘Apply’ being the dominant cognitive process for most educational levels. In the knowledge domain,
conceptual and procedural knowledge accounted for the majority of learning objectives. In both systems,
syllabuses at higher educational levels have higher cognitive demand. The cognitive processes and type of
knowledge involved are also influenced by the nature of the subjects.
URI: 
Appears in Collections:Educational Research AY2017/2018

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AngGeokXing-2019-DCSP.pdf4.85 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

17
checked on Jan 19, 2020

Download(s)

13
checked on Jan 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.