Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22089
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tan, Aik-Ling | en |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Kok Sing | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-28T03:06:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-28T03:06:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier | 10.4324/9780429441677-44 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Tan, A. L., & Tang, K. S. (2019). The role of dialogue in science epistemic practices. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education (pp. 547-558). Routledge. | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781138338517 (print) | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780429441677 (online) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22089 | - |
dc.description | This is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. The published version is available online at https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429441677-44 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Science as a field of study is defined by epistemic practices of questioning, inquiry, argumentation and legitimising scientific knowledge. These epistemic practices shape the kinds of talk in the classroom as scientific knowledge is “talked into being”. The question that we aim to answer with this chapter is “What is the unique function and role of dialogue in learning science epistemic practices?” Discourse analysis is a means to analyse scientific talk to review the mechanisms and patterns through which scientific knowledge is learnt. As such, to develop our argument, we first delve into the theoretical underpinnings based on a sociocultural perspective of dialogue in science education. This is followed by a review of empirical studies in science education that focusses on talk in four key science epistemic practices of questioning, science inquiry, argumentation and legitimising conceptual knowledge. The review provides evidence of dialogue as fundamental to both the enactment and learning of science epistemic practices by scientists and science students. We included a discussion about the way forward for dialogue in science and STEM education research. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | The role of dialogue in science epistemic practices | en |
dc.type | Book chapter | en |
local.message.claim | 2021-12-22T11:45:37.447+0800|||rp00048|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None | * |
item.grantfulltext | Open | - |
item.openairetype | Book chapter | - |
item.fulltext | With file | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Collections: | Book Chapters |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education-547.pdf | 345.79 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
146
checked on Mar 25, 2023
Download(s) 50
73
checked on Mar 25, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.