Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22124
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cai, Congcong | en |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Yifan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kong, Pui Wah | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-29T08:11:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-29T08:11:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Cai, C., Yang, Y., & Kong, P. W. (2017). Comparison of lower limb and back exercises for runners with chronic low back pain. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(12), 2374-2384. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0195-9131 (print) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1530-0315 (online) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22124 | - |
dc.description | This is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. The published version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This single-blind randomized trial was conducted to compare the treatment effect of lower limb (LL) exercises versus conventional lumbar extensor (LE) and lumbar stabilization (LS) exercises in recreational runners with chronic low back pain (cLBP), since there is currently no specific protocol for managing runners with cLBP. Methods: 84 recreational runners with cLBP were allocated to three exercise groups (LL, LE, LS) for an 8-week intervention. Outcome measures included self-rated pain and running capability, lower limb strength, back muscles function, and running gait. Participants were assessed at pre-, mid- and end-intervention; selected outcomes also followed up at three and six months. Generalized estimating equation was adopted to examine group-by-time interaction. Results: LL group improved 0.949 points per time point in Patient Specific Functional Scale (p < .001), which was higher than the LE (B = -0.198, p = .001) and LS groups (B = -0.263, p < .001). All three groups improved on average 0.746 points per time point in Numeric Pain Rating Scale for running induced pain (p < .001). Knee extension strength increased 0.260 Nm/kg per time point (p < .001) in the LL group, which was higher than the LE (B = -0.220 Nm/kg, p < .001) and LS groups (B = -0.206, p < .001). LL group also showed greater increase in running step length (2.464 cm per time point, p = .001) than LS group (B = -2.213, p = .013). All three groups improved similarly in back muscles function. Conclusion: LL exercise therapy could be a new option for cLPB management given its superior effects in improving running capability, knee extension strength, and running gait. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Legs | en |
dc.subject | Lumber extensor | en |
dc.subject | Lumbar stabilization | en |
dc.subject | Spine | en |
dc.title | Comparison of lower limb and back exercises for runners with chronic low back pain | en |
dc.type | Postprint | en |
dc.relation.dataset | https://doi.org/10.25340/R4/XUTA4E | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396 | - |
local.message.claim | 2021-12-27T10:52:21.313+0800|||rp00009|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None | * |
item.openairetype | Postprint | - |
item.fulltext | With file | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | Open | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MSSE-49-12-2374.pdf | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Aug 12, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
checked on Aug 11, 2022
Page view(s) 5
292
checked on Aug 12, 2022
Download(s) 20
223
checked on Aug 12, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.