Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22124
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCai, Congcongen
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yifanen
dc.contributor.authorKong, Pui Wahen
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-29T08:11:55Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-29T08:11:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCai, C., Yang, Y., & Kong, P. W. (2017). Comparison of lower limb and back exercises for runners with chronic low back pain. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(12), 2374-2384. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396en
dc.identifier.issn0195-9131 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn1530-0315 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10497/22124-
dc.descriptionThis is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. The published version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This single-blind randomized trial was conducted to compare the treatment effect of lower limb (LL) exercises versus conventional lumbar extensor (LE) and lumbar stabilization (LS) exercises in recreational runners with chronic low back pain (cLBP), since there is currently no specific protocol for managing runners with cLBP. Methods: 84 recreational runners with cLBP were allocated to three exercise groups (LL, LE, LS) for an 8-week intervention. Outcome measures included self-rated pain and running capability, lower limb strength, back muscles function, and running gait. Participants were assessed at pre-, mid- and end-intervention; selected outcomes also followed up at three and six months. Generalized estimating equation was adopted to examine group-by-time interaction. Results: LL group improved 0.949 points per time point in Patient Specific Functional Scale (p < .001), which was higher than the LE (B = -0.198, p = .001) and LS groups (B = -0.263, p < .001). All three groups improved on average 0.746 points per time point in Numeric Pain Rating Scale for running induced pain (p < .001). Knee extension strength increased 0.260 Nm/kg per time point (p < .001) in the LL group, which was higher than the LE (B = -0.220 Nm/kg, p < .001) and LS groups (B = -0.206, p < .001). LL group also showed greater increase in running step length (2.464 cm per time point, p = .001) than LS group (B = -2.213, p = .013). All three groups improved similarly in back muscles function. Conclusion: LL exercise therapy could be a new option for cLPB management given its superior effects in improving running capability, knee extension strength, and running gait.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectLegsen
dc.subjectLumber extensoren
dc.subjectLumbar stabilizationen
dc.subjectSpineen
dc.titleComparison of lower limb and back exercises for runners with chronic low back painen
dc.typePostprinten
dc.relation.datasethttps://doi.org/10.25340/R4/XUTA4E-
dc.identifier.doi10.1249/MSS.0000000000001396-
local.message.claim2021-12-27T10:52:21.313+0800|||rp00009|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
local.message.claim2022-10-26T11:30:04.539+0800|||rp00283|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith file-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypePostprint-
item.grantfulltextOpen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MSSE-49-12-2374.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Nov 25, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Nov 23, 2022

Page view(s) 5

318
checked on Nov 24, 2022

Download(s) 20

245
checked on Nov 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.