Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22559
Title: 
Authors: 
Subjects: 
Document co-citation analysis
Language assessment
Measurement
Review
Scientometrics
Validity
Visualization
Second language acquisition
Issue Date: 
2020
Citation: 
Aryadoust, V., Azrifah Zakaria, Lim, M. H., & Chen, C. (2020). An extensive knowledge mapping review of measurement and validity in language assessment and SLA research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941
Abstract: 
This study set out to investigate intellectual domains as well as the use of measurement and validation methods in language assessment research and second language acquisition (SLA) published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Using Scopus, we created two datasets: (i) a dataset of core journals consisting of 1,561 articles published in four language assessment journals, and (ii) a dataset of general journals consisting of 3,175 articles on language assessment published in the top journals of SLA and applied linguistics. We applied document co-citation analysis to detect thematically distinct research clusters. Next, we coded citing papers in each cluster based on an analytical framework for measurement and validation. We found that the focus of the core journals was more exclusively on reading and listening comprehension assessment (primary), facets of speaking and writing performance such as raters and validation (secondary), as well as feedback, corpus linguistics, and washback (tertiary). By contrast, the primary focus of assessment research in the general journals was on vocabulary, oral proficiency, essay writing, grammar, and reading. The secondary focus was on affective schemata, awareness, memory, language proficiency, explicit vs. implicit language knowledge, language or semantic awareness, and semantic complexity. With the exception of language proficiency, this second area of focus was absent in the core journals. It was further found that the majority of citing publications in the two datasets did not carry out inference-based validation on their instruments before using them. More research is needed to determine what motivates authors to select and investigate a topic, how thoroughly they cite past research, and what internal (within a field) and external (between fields) factors lead to the sustainability of a Research Topic in language assessment.
URI: 
ISSN: 
1664-1078
DOI: 
Project number: 
RI 1/18 VSA
Grant ID: 
NIE Academic Research Fund
Funding Agency: 
Paragon Testing Enterprises, Canada
National Institute of Education, Singapore
File Permission: 
Open
File Availability: 
With file
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FP-11-1941.pdf1.81 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Feb 3, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Jan 29, 2023

Page view(s)

103
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Download(s) 50

40
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.