Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/22908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSim, Alexiaaen
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Stephen F.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T07:53:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-04T07:53:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier10.1186/s40337-021-00396-7-
dc.identifier.citationSim, A., & Burns, S. F. (2021). Review: Questionnaires as measures for low energy availability (LEA) and relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) in athletes. Journal of Eating Disorders, 9, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00396-7en
dc.identifier.issn2050-2974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10497/22908-
dc.descriptionThis is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in Journal of Eating Disorders. The published version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00396-7en
dc.description.abstractBackground A sustained mismatch between energy intake and exercise energy expenditure (EEE) can lead to Low Energy Availability (LEA), health and performance impairments characteristic of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). Questionnaires can conveniently identify symptoms and/or LEA/ RED-S risk factors. This study aimed to systematically identify, and critique questionnaires used or developed to measure LEA/ RED-S risk in athletic populations. <br>Methods A systematic search was conducted using PubMed database. Full text articles were included if: (i) the questionnaire(s) in the study identified LEA and/or RED-S risk; (ii) studies developed questionnaires to identify LEA and/or RED-S risk; (iii) participants belonged to athletic population(s); and (iv) in English. <br>Results Thirty-three articles met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed, 13 questionnaires were identified. Eight questionnaires had undergone validation procedures, and three questionnaires included questions related to EEE. The most widely used validated questionnaires were Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) (48% articles) and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) (12% articles). The LEAF-Q determines LEA risk from symptoms but cannot be used in males as nearly half of the items (nā€‰=ā€‰12) relate to menstrual function. The EDE-Q serves as a surrogate marker of LEA risk in both sexes, as it measures a major risk factor of LEA, disordered eating. Better validation is needed for many questionnaires and more are needed to address LEA/RED-S risk in male athletes. <br>Conclusion These questionnaires may be effective in identifying intentional energy restriction but less valuable in identifying inadvertently failure to increase energy intake with increased EEE.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00396-7-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectLow energy availabilityen
dc.subjectEnergy deficiencyen
dc.subjectRelative energy deficiency in sporten
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectAthlete triad syndromeen
dc.subjectFeeding and eating disordersen
dc.subjectMental disordersen
dc.titleReview: Questionnaires as measures for low energy availability (LEA) and relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) in athletesen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JED-9-41.pdf398.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

39
checked on May 15, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on May 15, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.