Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/24204
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeo, Eunice Xiao Sien
dc.contributor.authorChhabra, K.en
dc.contributor.authorKong, Pui Wahen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T07:00:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T07:00:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationYeo, E. X., Chhabra, K., & Kong, P. W. (2022). Influence of combat boot types on in-shoe forces and perceived comfort during unloaded and loaded walking. BMJ Military Health, Article e002061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002061en
dc.identifier.issn2633-3767 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn2633-3775 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10497/24204-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Combat boots are essential protective gear for military personnel. The purposes of the present study were to examine (1) the influence of combat boot type on ground reaction force (GRF) variables and perceived comfort during unloaded and loaded walking and (2) the relationship between comfort and biomechanical measurements. Methods Four types of combat boots with different physical features (eg, mass, thickness) and mechanical properties (eg, cushioning, rigidity) were compared across 61 male participants with experience in military marching while carrying heavy loads. In each boot type, participants completed a 10-m walk under an unloaded and a 20-kg loaded conditions at their preferred speeds. Peak force and loading rate during walking were measured using the loadsol wireless in-shoe sensor system. Comfort level was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale. Difference between loaded and unloaded walking, and across boot types were statistically compared. Correlation analyses were performed between comfort and GRF variables. Results On average across all boot types, participants walked 2.1% slower when carrying 20-kg loads while experiencing 24.3% higher peak force and 20.8% higher loading rate. Boot D was perceived as most comfortable, followed by boots C, B and A (χ2(2)=115.4, p<0.001). Participants walked slightly faster (p=0.022, ηp2 = 0.052) and displayed higher loading rates (p<0.001, ηp2=0.194) in the two more comfortable boots (C and D) than the less comfortable boots (A and B). No significant correlations were found between perceived comfort and any GRF variables. Conclusions Combat boot features can influence perceived comfort ratings substantially during walking, whereas biomechanical differences among boot types are more subtle regardless of load conditions. The lack of relationship between comfort and force variables suggests that both subjective and objective measurements should be considered for comprehensive evaluation of combat boots.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Military Healthen
dc.titleInfluence of combat boot types on in-shoe forces and perceived comfort during unloaded and loaded walkingen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002061-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo file-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextNone-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Jun 25, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.