Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/24875
Title: 
Authors: 
Issue Date: 
2023
Citation: 
Waschl, N., Khng, K. H., Bull, R., Ng, E. L., Sun, H., & Chan, W. T. (2023). Screening for executive function difficulties: An evaluation of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2nd Edition Screener, Teacher Report (BRIEF2-TS). Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001188
Journal: 
Psychological Assessment
Abstract: 
Executive functions (EFs) correlate positively with many developmental outcomes, and ecologically valid measures of EFs may be more predictive of some outcomes than performance-based measures. Accordingly, there is a need to evaluate short EF rating scales, such as the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2nd Edition Screener, Teacher Report (BRIEF2-TS). Data from 1,322 kindergarten children in Singapore (50% girls; 61.3% Chinese, 10.6% Malay, 16.3% Indian, 4.0% other ethnicity, and 7.8% did not report their ethnicity), followed for 3 years, were used to examine the multilevel factor structure, gender and longitudinal invariance, reliability, and concurrent and predictive validity of BRIEF2-TS scores. Results indicated a two-factor within-level structure (11 items; cognitive and emotional–behavioral regulation) that was at least partially invariant across gender and time. Concurrent validity with direct EF measures and ratings of self-regulation, and predictive validity for socioemotional and academic skills were good. Overall, BRIEF2-TS scores showed evidence for good validity and reliability. Future research should consider correlates of the between-level structure and further consider structure and validity in clinical samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
URI: 
ISSN: 
1040-3590 (print)
1939-134X (online)
DOI: 
Funding Agency: 
Ministry of Education, Singapore
File Permission: 
None
File Availability: 
No file
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Mar 17, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.