Conference Papers
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
- PublicationOpen AccessThe effects of individual preparation on students’ collaborative argumentation-based learning: An exploratory study in a secondary school classroom(Global Science Society on Computers in Education, 2023)
; ;Su, Junzhu ;Lyu, Qianru ;Li, Xinyi ;Chai, Aileen Siew Cheng ;Su, GuoNg, Eng Eng - PublicationOpen Access基于学习分析 的 形成性 反馈对 小组 协 作 论证 效果 及 交互 关系 的影响研究 = Exploring the utility of learning analytics-based formative feedback for collaborative argumentation and interaction relationships(Global Science Society on Computers in Education, 2023)
; ;Li, Xinyi ;Su, Junzhu ;Lyu, Qianru ;Chai, Aileen Siew Cheng ;Ng, Eng EngSu, Guo - PublicationMetadata onlyEpistemic network analysis to assess collaborative engagement in knowledge building discourse(2023)
;Ong, Aloysius; ; Knowledge Building (KB) is an established learning sciences theory that seeks to promote innovative ideas and idea improvement among students via collaborative engagement in productive discourse. KB discourse supports students to make constructive discourse moves such as questioning, explaining with evidence, adding new information and so on, to advance the collective inquiry. However, current understanding on KB discourse remains limited to students’ online participation. Although small group discussion is a common practice, there is little understanding on the role of verbal discussions to support KB discourse. This paper attempts to address this line of inquiry by assessing student engagement in KB discourse supported by both online and verbal discussions. Data is retrieved from a group of six students in a Grade 6 Social Studies class. The group participated in a 2.5hr lesson designed with opportunities for discussions on the Knowledge Forum (online) and in small groups (verbal). Group talk was transcribed, and Knowledge Forum notes were coded for its semantic level of contribution, with the codes being analysed for weighted connections using Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). The ENA analysis revealed clear differences in both group and individual engagement between the online and verbal discourse. Notably, students’ contributions on Knowledge Forum showed an apparent pattern of stronger connections among codes of higher semantic levels, suggesting that students were more cognitively engaged in the online discussion than their group verbal talk. Implications for research and practice are discussed.12 - PublicationMetadata onlyLearning with conversational AI and personas: A systematic literature review(2023)
;Drobnjak, Antun ;Botički, Ivica; Kahn, KenThis paper describes the results of a systematic review dealing with the use of personas, avatars, and characters in conjunction with AI-supported tools such as chatbots or generative AI in education. Although the use generative AI in education is gaining traction, this study seeks to systematically review the body of knowledge dealing with personified and conversational approaches to education with both pre-generative and generative AI. The results of the study emphasize the importance of the three key elements of such systems: the use of pedagogical agents, interaction, and personalization. These key elements can be relevant when considering the adoption of the new generation of generative AI in education. Such systems should scaffold learners’ understanding providing guidance and support, promote self-directedness and ensure effectiveness in learning, provide customized learning paths, and promote ethical use.
16 - PublicationMetadata onlyEffects of a machine learning-empowered Chinese character handwriting learning tool on rectifying legible writing in young children: A pilot study(2023)
; ; ; ;Ching Chiuan Yen ;Teo, Chor GuanThe logographic nature of Chinese script is a major dissuading factor for learning handwriting. The challenge is the complex psycholinguistic process behind handwriting. Thus, we developed AI-Strokes, a Chinese handwriting learning tool that assists teachers in facilitating students’ handwriting practice in various modalities, and provides personalized feedback for the students. By leveraging a trainable Machine Learning back-end framework, the tool diagnoses and scores students’ handwriting errors. This paper reports a pilot study in a Singapore primary school with an early prototype of AI-Strokes. Two classes of students went through AI-Strokes-based Chinese handwriting lessons (the experimental group) and conventional lessons (the control group) respectively. Pre- and post-tests were administered, and their handwriting processes were analyzed regarding errors in stroke orders, extra/missing strokes, and errors in stroke directions. The results show that the experimental group has yielded significantly better learning gains than the control group. It is posited that the personalized feedback of AI-Strokes has formed a feedback loop to support students’ trial-and-error process in improving their handwriting skills. The multimodal handwriting task design may have also fostered their orthographic awareness through the activation of alternative psycholinguistic pathways during their handwriting lessons.13