Repository logo
  • Log In
Repository logo
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. NIE Publications & Research Output
  3. Electronic Academic Papers
  4. Journal Articles
  5. Effects of isometric strength and plyometric training on running performance: A randomized controlled study
 
  • Details
Options

Effects of isometric strength and plyometric training on running performance: A randomized controlled study

URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10497/24009
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Type
Article
Citation
Lum, D., Barbosa, T. M., Abdul Rashid Aziz, & Balasekaran, G. (2022). Effects of isometric strength and plyometric training on running performance: A randomized controlled study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94(1), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1969330
Author
Lum, Danny Wan Yin
•
Barbosa, Tiago M.
•
Abdul Rashid Aziz
•
Balasekaran, Govindasamy 
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of isometric strength (IST) and plyometric training (PT) on endurance running performance. Methods: Twenty-six endurance runners (18 males and 8 females; age 36 ± 6 years, stature 1.69 ± 0.05 m body mass 61.6 ± 8.0 kg, VO2max 50.4 ± 5.8 ml·kg−1·min−1) completed the countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), 2.4 km run time trial (2.4kmTT), running economy test (RE) and a graded exercise test measures at baseline. They were then randomly assigned to three groups, the control (CON), PT or IST group, and completed the circuit, plyometric or isometric training, respectively, twice a week for 6 weeks, while still continuing to perform their planned running training. They then completed the same set of measures performed at baseline post-intervention. Results: Significant time x group interactions and time main effect were observed for 2.4kmTT (P = .002, ƞ2p = .45 and P < .001, ƞ2 =0.72), maximal aerobic speed (MAS) (P = .006, ƞ2p = .39), CMJ height (P < .001, ƞ2p = .55) and IMTP relative peak force (P = .001, ƞ2p = .50) in favor of PT and IST. Significant main effect for time was observed for 2.4kmTT (P < .001, ƞ2p = .72), RE (P = .048, ƞ2p = .17), VO2max (P = .047, ƞ2p = .18), MAS (P < .001, ƞ2p = .63), CMJ height (P < .001, ƞ2p = .51) and IMTP relative peak force (P < .001, ƞ2p = .58). Conclusion: In conclusion, both PT and IST were similarly effective at enhancing running endurance performance. However, IST resulted in greater improvement to RE.
Keywords
  • Countermovement jump

  • Isometric mid-thigh p...

  • Maximal aerobic speed...

  • Running economy

Date Issued
2022
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Journal
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
DOI
10.1080/02701367.2021.1969330
  • Contact US
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

NTU Reg No: 200604393R. Copyright National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University (NIE NTU), Singapore

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science