Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/19458
Title: 
Authors: 
Keywords: 
Collaborative argumentation
Computer-supported collaborative learning
Learning analytics
Assessment for learning
Issue Date: 
2017
Citation: 
Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2017). Measuring process and outcome of the scientific argumentation in a CSCL environment. In W. Chen, J.-C. Yang, A. F. Mohd Ayub, S. L. Wong, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 139-145). Retrieved from http://icce2017.canterbury.ac.nz/sites/default/files/proceedings/main/C2/Measuring%20Process%20and%20Outcome%20of%20the%20Scientific%20Argumentation%20in%20a%20CSCL%20Environment.pdf
Abstract: 
This paper describes the conceptualization and operationalization of the scientific
argumentation in a CSCL environment. An online platform is designed to support students’
collaborative argumentation with diagram-based representations of argumentation based on
Toulmin’s (1958) Argumentation framework. Based on existing analytic frameworks of
collaborative argumentation while accommodating the specific demands and characteristics of
the target users and the environment involved, a conceptual framework and a group of
indicators are derived for operationalizing the measurement constructs of the process and
outcome of students’ collaborative argumentation.
Description: 
This paper was published in the 2017 proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education held at Christchurch, New Zealand from 4 - 8 December 2017
URI: 
Website: 
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ICCE-2017-139.pdf285.47 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

76
Last Week
1
Last month
4
checked on Oct 28, 2020

Download(s) 50

100
checked on Oct 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.