Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/23594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yin Lingen
dc.contributor.authorKang, Shuangjuanen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T08:37:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-14T08:37:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCheung, Y. L., & Kang, S. (2021). Textual borrowing in dissertation writing: Perceptions of supervisors and supervisees. The Qualitative Report, 26(9), 2797-2817. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.3025en
dc.identifier.issn1052-0147 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn2160-3715 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10497/23594-
dc.descriptionThe open access publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.3025en
dc.description.abstractThe existing literature shows issues pertinent to students’ inappropriate textual borrowing behaviors require further examination. Our study aims to address two questions: What are the reasons why postgraduate students’ misuse their dissertation sources? How do the dissertation supervisors react to students’ inappropriate source use, if any? In this situated qualitative study (Atkinson, 2005), we used data collected through in-depth email interviews with two applied linguistics postgraduate students and their dissertation supervisors. Regarding the analytical process, the researchers condensed the provisional themes through techniques suggested by grounded theory (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). The results reveal that causes for postgraduate students’ misuse of sources include students' lack of access to literature, poor literature-searching and documenting skills, and lack of instructional support on using literature. Supervisors have neither identified nor addressed the source misuse in their feedback given to students. This finding suggests the university's regulating culture/pedagogical support and cross-culturally variant perception of plagiarism are crucial to our understanding of textual plagiarism among postgraduate students. The commonly suggested language proficiency may not be perceived as a cause of plagiarism in the current study. The discussion includes implication for a need to provide students with a disciplinary appropriate way of citing sources.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Qualitative Reporten
dc.titleTextual borrowing in dissertation writing: Perceptions of supervisors and superviseesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.46743/2160-3715/2021.3025-
dc.subject.keywordEmail interviewsen
dc.subject.keywordSituated qualitative researchen
dc.subject.keywordDissertation writingen
dc.subject.keywordSource useen
dc.subject.keywordTextual borrowingen
dc.subject.keywordPerceptionsen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextNone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo file-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

31
checked on Sep 27, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.