Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Publication
    Open Access
    Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample

    Using a convenience sample of 289 teachers in Singapore, this study examined: (1) whether there were significant differences between teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviours; and (2) teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviours in relation to teachers’ psychological empowerment. Results indicated that teachers perceived their principals and immediate supervisors as exercising empowering behaviours in their daily practices, but they also perceived their principal and immediate supervisor differing in magnitude in some specific dimensions of empowering behaviours such as delegation of authority, providing individualised concern and support, articulating a vision and fostering collaborative relationships.

    Results also indicated that teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviours were positively associated with teachers’ psychological empowerment, and that they added unique variance to each other in predicting teachers’ psychological empowerment. This study suggests the importance of considering teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviours as two distinct constructs in empirical research so that their unique predictive power could be more aptly captured. From a practical standpoint, it suggests the importance for school leadership developers to enhance school leaders’ awareness and capacity in exercising empowering behaviours towards their teachers in their daily practice. Essentially, schools may stand to gain from developing empowering leaders at different levels of management to promote teachers’ psychological empowerment.

    WOS© Citations 21Scopus© Citations 38  238  1275
  • Publication
    Open Access
    Study orchestrations and motivational differences in a mathematical context
    (Elsevier, 2017) ;
    The aims of this study are to examine the learning approach profiles, or study orchestrations, of 357 pre-university students and its relations to academic achievement and motivation. As study orchestrations are context-specific, the current research is based on the subject of mathematics. Results indicated that four types of study orchestrations emerged: high-high, high-low, high-mid and low-low in deep and surface learning. Students with a high-high and high-low study orchestration had the highest academic achievement and intrinsic motivation. The level of identified regulation differs across all clusters whereas there were no significant differences in introjection except for the low-low study orchestration. External regulation is associated mainly with surface learning. Amotivation is associated mainly with a lack of deep learning.
    WOS© Citations 3Scopus© Citations 5  420  263
  • Publication
    Metadata only
    Focus on competing for performance or mastering new knowledge? Insights from discovering the relations between classroom goal structures and students’ learning in Singapore secondary schools
    (Springer, 2016)
    There have been heated debates on whether the focus on competition should be used as an approach to motivate learning and thus promote performance. This issue seems more salient in Singapore due to its highly competitive education system. Achievement goal theory was used to guide this research in the search for answers to this question. Data were collected from 8011 Secondary 3 students in 247 classes across 39 schools in Singapore. Two types of classroom environment were studied. One was classroom performance goal structure, which refers to the classroom climate focused on competing for performance; another was classroom mastery goal structure, which refers to the classroom climate focused on mastering new skills and knowledge. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was conducted to analyze multilevel data. The results from both English and mathematics classrooms showed consistent findings: classroom mastery goal structure was positively related to students’ academic self-efficacy, interest and enjoyment, personal mastery goal orientation, and engagement, whereas classroom performance goal structure was positively related to personal performance avoidance goal orientation and negatively related to academic achievement. Specifically, in English classrooms, classroom performance goal structure was positively related to avoidance coping and negatively related to engagement. In general, the results from the current study suggest that classroom mastery goal structure, rather than classroom performance goal structure, should be recommended as motivational strategies.
      21
  • Publication
    Open Access
    Turning achievement around: Predictors of academic resilience of academically at-risk students in Singapore
    (National Institute of Education (Singapore), 2018) ;
    Tan, Jennifer Pei-Ling
    ;
    ;
    King, Ronnel B.
    ;
    Kalthom Ahmad
    ;
      454  478
  • Publication
    Open Access
    Lessons from resilience-nurturing environments: Classroom practices of turnaround teachers
    (National Institute of Education (Singapore), 2019) ;
    Tan, Michelle Yuen Sze
    ;
    Chua, Jenny
    ;
    ;
    Nur Qamarina Ilham
    ;
    Tan, Raphaela Hui Yi
    ;
    Lee, Fang Hui
      385  354